Free Samples
Property Developments Julian,Sol And Daniel.
.cms-body-content table{width:100%!important;} #subhidecontent{ position: relative;
overflow-x: auto;
width: 100%;}
Property Developments Julian,Sol And Daniel.
0 Download5 Pages / 1,107 Words
Questions:
1. What common law duty and statutory duty if any has Julian breached?
2. What common law or statutory duty have Sol and Daniel breached?
3. If the directors have breached their duties do any of them have a defence and if not what are the consequences for them?
Answers:
1. Fiduciary duty of Loyalty
Under the common law he director has been placed with a fiduciary duty. This duty includes the duty to act with grim loyalty to the company. Under the common law a director is a fiduciary of a company and it is expected that they will not enter into any transaction that they stand to benefit from or which they have an interest in. This basic common law duty was held in Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Brothers (1854) where the court decided that a director should not take part in self dealing. The court further held that any transaction that is conducted by a director who has an interest in it shall be voidable and be terminated at the will of the company. Julian had a personal interest in the contract for the sale of land because his aim was not exonerate his uncle Gerald from the bank loan misery, although he did not stand to gain any material benefit. It can thus be conceded that Julian has breached this this common law duty.
Duty to Avoid Conflict
Pursuant to section 191(1) a director has been placed under a duty to void any material personal interstate in any in any issue that is related to the company affairs (Corporation Act 2001). This section requires that where there is such an interest, the director must disclose it by way of notice to other directors. It is evident that Julian did not disclose that he had a personal interest in the contract for the sale of land. In McGellin v Mount King Mining NL (1998) the court held that the test that is applied is whether a reasonable person will be convinced that the interest affected the judgment of the director. Julian was affected by the interest because he went on to vote for the decision during the board meeting. According S192(1) to notice of any personal interest must be in writing and be given during a directors meeting. The notice must explain suffieciently for the board of director to clearly understand the interest (Camelot Resources v MacDonald,1994). There has been no evidence that a notice has been supplied by Julian.
Duty not to make improper use of information
By dint of s183(1) a director must not obtain any information from the company for his own personal advantage or for the advantage of some else (Corporation Act 2001). In Commissioner for Corporate Affairs v Green (1978) the court insisted that the information must be used for the advantage of the director or someone else. It is evident that that Julian used information from the company to benefit his brother Raphael so that he may win the tender. This is contrary to the corporation act and Julian is thus in breached of the duty under s183 (1).
2. Duty of care
Directors have the common law duty to exercise their responsibilities and duty with reasonable care and due diligence. In Daniels v AWA (1992) the court affirmed this common law duty by holding that the directors have the moral imperative to take reasonable measures to ensure that they oversee the operations activities of the company. In Australian Securities Commission v Gallagher (1993) the court held that the standard of care and skill that was expected was that of an ordinary person in the same position as the director. Sol and Daniel were reckless as to the fact they were required professionally to conduct an independent valuation and thus were in breach of the duty of skill and care expected of the directors.
Duty to act with reasonable care and Due Diligence
Pursuant to S180 (1) a director has been vested with the obligation to act with reasonable care and due diligence in a manner that any reasonable person would do (Corporation Act 2001). In ASIC v MacDonald (2009) the court held that the test that should be applied is an objective one where the question will be what an ordinary person who has the same professional experience and expertise as the defendant would do in the same circumstance. It has also been held that the standard of care is judged by what a prudent person would do in similar circumstances. Sol and Daniel expected to exercise skill and care in their duty to oversee the company’s activities and they failed to do so. A reasonable and prudent person having an ordinary skill as is expected of them would have conducted an independent valuation of the land and would ensure that they are aware of all the operation of the company but they failed to do so and have not been keen with the operations of the company (Re City Equitable Fire Insurance Co, 1925). Furthermore, in Daniels v AWA (1992) the court insisted that the director of a company must keep himself informed of all activities and operation that go on in a company. It is imperative to note that the court in Vines v ASIC (2007) noted that common law application of the duty of care and due diligence is similar to the statutory application in Australia.
3. Consequences for Breach
In law it is a general principle that ignorance of the law is not a defense and therefore the directors cannot claim innocent mistake because they did not know understand the legal position of the director duties. The only practical defense that would be applicable for the breach of section 191(1) would be that the director had given a sufficient notice of the conflict of interest but this has not been given by Julian.
A breach of section S180 (1) on the duty of reasonable care and due diligence invites a civil penalty and a criminal liability 5 years imprisonment or fine of $200, 000. A breach pursuant to section 191(1) attracts a civil penalty of 10 units or an imprisonment of 3 months or both. If the breach of the duty of care causes a detriment to the company the director may be required to pay for the detriment caused or return any benefit that he has incurred to the company inform of damages.
References
Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Brothers [1854] UKHL 1
ASIC v Macdonald (No 12) [2009] NSWSC
Australian Securities Commission v Gallagher (1994) 11 WAR 105
AWA Ltd v Daniels (1992) 7 ACSR 759
Camelot Resources Ltd v MacDonald (1994) 14 ACSR 437
Corporate Affairs Commission v. Green [1978] VR 505
Corporation Act 2001 (cth)
McGellin v Mount King Mining NL (1998) 144 FLR 228
Re City Equitable Fire Insurance Co [1925] Ch 407
Vines v ASIC [2007] NSWCA 75
Free Membership to World’s Largest Sample Bank
To View this & another 50000+ free samples. Please put
your valid email id.
Yes, alert me for offers and important updates
Submit
Download Sample Now
Earn back the money you have spent on the downloaded sample by uploading a unique assignment/study material/research material you have. After we assess the authenticity of the uploaded content, you will get 100% money back in your wallet within 7 days.
UploadUnique Document
DocumentUnder Evaluation
Get Moneyinto Your Wallet
Total 5 pages
PAY 3 USD TO DOWNLOAD
*The content must not be available online or in our existing Database to qualify as
unique.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
APA
MLA
Harvard
OSCOLA
Vancouver
My Assignment Help. (2018). Property Developments Julian,Sol And Daniel.. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/property-developments-juliansol-and-daniel.
“Property Developments Julian,Sol And Daniel..” My Assignment Help, 2018, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/property-developments-juliansol-and-daniel.
My Assignment Help (2018) Property Developments Julian,Sol And Daniel. [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/property-developments-juliansol-and-daniel[Accessed 19 December 2021].
My Assignment Help. ‘Property Developments Julian,Sol And Daniel.’ (My Assignment Help, 2018)
My Assignment Help. Property Developments Julian,Sol And Daniel. [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2018 [cited 19 December 2021]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/property-developments-juliansol-and-daniel.
×
.close{position: absolute;right: 5px;z-index: 999;opacity: 1;color: #ff8b00;}
×
Thank you for your interest
The respective sample has been mail to your register email id
×
CONGRATS!
$20 Credited
successfully in your wallet.
* $5 to be used on order value more than $50. Valid for
only 1
month.
Account created successfully!
We have sent login details on your registered email.
User:
Password:
Getting academic assistance from MyAssignmenthelp.com is a wise decision. Many students, finding the answer to their queries ‘who will Do my essay for cheap’ are likely to find our services useful and beneficial. They no longer need to waste their time in typing ‘can someone write my essay at cheap price’, instead they can hire our cheap essay writers to complete the due papers perfectly within given deadline.
Latest Business Law Samples
div#loaddata .card img {max-width: 100%;
}
BU1112 Business Law
Download :
0 | Pages :
6
Course Code: BU1112
University: James Cook University
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Australia
Answer:
Part A
Issue:
Whether Stella is considered as an employee of PRX?
Rule:
The main difference between employee and independent contractor is stated below:
Employee entered into contract of service, but contractor entered into contract for services.
Employer exercise control over the employee but no control was exercised by employer on contractor. It is considered as traditional test which was developed in Zuijs v Wirth Bros(Zuijs…
Read
More
Tags:
Australia South Lake Management health finance management University of New South Wales
BSBWHS605 Develop Implement And Maintain WHS Management Systems
Download :
0 | Pages :
15
Course Code: BSBWHS605
University: Swinburne University Of Technology
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Australia
Answers:
Work Health and Safety Management System (WHSMS) is a collection of plans, tools, activities and processes. List 3 of these plans, tools, activities or processes and explain what they are,
The means, nitty gritty beneath, can be utilized whether the arranging procedure is straightforward or complex. They are:
Evaluating the current word related to wellbeing and security status including the ‘administration framework’ Lussier, R. N…
Read
More
Tags:
Australia Brisbane Management Work Health and Safety Management System (WHSMS University of Brisbane MBA
BUSN331 Business Law
Download :
0 | Pages :
3
Course Code: BUSN331
University: Centennial College
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Canada
Answers:
Introduction
In Alberta, the Residential Tenancies Act applies to all the people in this jurisdiction, who rent their space out (Alberta Queen’s Printer, 2016). Through this act, the rights and responsibilities of the landlords and tenants are brought forward (Landlord and Tenant, 2015).
Question 1
Before a tenant can move in the rented accommodation, the tenant and the landlord have to reach an agreement, with regards to the…
Read
More
Tags:
Australia Edmonton Humanities Management University of New South Wales Masters in Business Administration
LA1040 Contract Law
Download :
0 | Pages :
11
Course Code: LA1040
University: University Of London
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: United Kingdom
Answer:
Introduction
A contract is an agreement between the parties which is enforceable legally in the courts. There are several provisions of law which governs how the terms related to the contract would operate. A contract consists of a set of provisions which are known as contractual terms. The weightage of such terms are not equal as one term may have a more significant consequence as compared to the other in relation to their brea…
Read
More
Tags:
United Kingdom London Economics Management University of London
TLAW202 Corporations Law
Download :
0 | Pages :
9
Course Code: TLAW202
University: Top Education Institute
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Australia
Answers:
1.
If any person wants to carry out his business in the form of a company, then, it is necessary that the registration or incorporation requirements of such country must be met. In Australia, the Corporation Act 2001 and the guidelines laid down by ASIC provides with the steps that must be accomplish in order to establish a corporate entity. (Malbon & Bishop, 2006).
A company is of great significance as it is treated as a …
Read
More
Next